It’s time to change the narrative on Central Pier

The past few months have brought further division on the issue of Docklands’ sleeping giant Central Pier, in a situation where there are proving to be no winners.

In December, the pier’s owner Development Victoria (DV) announced that it was preparing to remove the western tip of Central Pier from Victoria Harbour as it begins the process of “safely revitalising the historic Victorian dock”.

As DV pointed out in a press release issued on December 15, the pier’s western tip has been inaccessible for several years after being deemed structurally unsound. That section, as well the entire pier, requires a permit from Heritage Victoria before it can be touched.

This news was followed by DV releasing an expression of interest for “demolition works” of Central Pier on December 21, seen by Docklands News. While DV said the timing of the tender release was dependent on a heritage permit being submitted, it was approved back in March last year.

And while this document could easily be dismissed as a “tyre kicking exercise”, a phrase some within DV have used to describe the process, it calls for expressions of interest into the possible “demolition, removal and disposal of buildings, structures and all remaining assets”.

There is little doubt that should the heritage-listed pier be reinstated in the future, it will require extensive demolition across various sections before heritage elements can be retained and restored, and the pier rebuilt.

That is, at least, what the community expects. And after a story appeared in The Age in January unearthing Federal Court documents from the case between DV and its anchor tenant Atlantic Group, which exposed DV’s knowledge of the pier’s critical condition long before its sudden closure in August 2019, it’s what the community deserves.

But DV’s press release titled “Western tip of Central Pier to be removed” and an ensuing document putting out the feelers for possible demolition of the pier in its entirety, is somewhat presumptuous without the all-clear from Heritage Victoria.

And while DV clearly states it is working with Heritage Victoria on this journey, to the awaiting public and local community in Docklands, these moves set a narrative that the cart has left before the horse.

The future of Central Pier is, according to DV, still undetermined and long-term planning for its resurrection will only be done so with “extensive engagement with the community and key stakeholders to create a vision for Victoria Harbour and Central Pier.”

“DV is currently preparing to remove the western tip of Central Pier from Victoria Harbour in Docklands. The scope of works across the rest of Central Pier is yet to be determined,” Geoff Ward, Group Head, Precincts, DV, said.

“We’re working closely with Heritage Victoria on the long-term plans for Central Pier, and we will consult with the community and local business throughout the process.”

But for a community that is eagerly awaiting clear information on its maritime asset, the prospects, whether real or not, of demolitions being earmarked without knowledge is the wrong narrative to be setting.

This coupled with the piece in The Age published on January 19, which exposed DV’s alleged knowledge of the pier’s risk of “catastrophic failure” around 10 months before the pier’s sudden evacuation, doesn’t help DV’s cause either.

Click here for the full article

“It’s devastating”

Woolshed general manager Duncan Laidlaw was forced to say farewell to his staff last month, conceding that the uncertainty surrounding the future of Central Pier was just “too great.”

The Herald Sun can reveal checks carried out every two months in the 12 months to August this year by engineering consultant KBR failed to detect that almost a third of the piles under Shed 14 had some form of defects.

Having overcome numerous hurdles over his 11 years at the Woolshed, including a fire in 2016, he told Docklands News that seeing the heritage pier fenced off still gave him a “hollow feeling” in his stomach.

However, he said nothing had been more heartbreaking than having to deliver the news to his staff that they would be made redundant, following Development Victoria’s (DV’s) decision in September to close the pier until 2020 amid safety concerns.

While Mr Laidlaw said that the business was hopeful of returning to Docklands
next year and had since supported staff in finding work elsewhere, he said the whole experience had been “gut-wrenching.”

  • “It [laying off staff] was heartbreak,” he said. “There were so many tears and there is a lot of love from everyone, but they’re just gutted.”
  • “They’ve accepted that we had to let them go but just not to see each other’s faces every day is a big thing and that’s what we all talk about when we catch up. It’s unbelievable.”

Tenants are now questioning how they can trust Development Victoria appointed KBR — and are demanding to know if people were placed at risk.

The Woolshed is part of a group of businesses on Central Pier that collectively employed more than 1300 staff prior to its sudden shutdown in August by landlord DV.

The businesses, led by the pier’s anchor tenant Atlantic Group which has a lease on the pier until 2026, last month announced that it would be suing DV for $100 million for what it alleged as a “failure” to maintain the pier.

In their statement of claim launched in the Federal Court on October 7, tenants argued that DV “engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct” and “did not act reasonably” when it shut the pier down on August 28 without providing a “proper report” of its condition.

Docklands News’ request to DV for a copy of the engineering report that led to the shutdown under Freedom of Information (FoI) was formally denied last month. Key reasons cited by DV included that its disclosure was contrary to the public interest, sensitivity of information and that its release would compromise the quality of future engineering works on the pier. A request for review of the decision has been submitted to the Victorian Information Commissioner.

Mr Laidlaw said that while all business matters would be determined in court, he wasn’t shy in criticising DV for showing “no support” to those affected.

  • “We haven’t had a word. Not a word,” he said. “No information, no dates, not even what’s wrong with the pier … we don’t even know what’s wrong with it. Where is it damaged? What’s made it that way? Nothing. Zero.”
  • “Hatem [Saleh] and Tony Schiavello [Atlantic Group] and that have their meetings with them [DV], but they’re still told basically nothing. So, they can’t pass on information they don’t have. That’s the hard part of it.”
  • “They’ve said they are supporting us as I’ve seen on the news … doing what? Did you help my staff find jobs? Did you come and help pay their bills? Did you come and say, ‘really sorry guys, what can we do to help?’. None. Zero. So, what have you done to support us?”
  • “We’ve had that many issues down here with road closures, when they moved the tram lines and they’re always doing works here and there and there’s always been a hurdle, but we’ve managed to get over it and keep our business rising.”
  • “So, to shut us down with no reason, no excuse, no apology. We’re paying you rent. Their job is to maintain that pier. They haven’t maintained it and it’s devastating for the whole of Docklands and Victoria because it’s heritage-listed.”

Mr Laidlaw said that the knock-on effect of the pier’s closure on local businesses and the Docklands community had been “huge” and that like many of his fellow Docklanders, he hoped to see the pier reopen as soon as possible.

  • “My biggest thing is the staff. The human element that has been lost. The thousands of people that live and work and breathe off it,” he said.
  • “The disappointing thing, as a resident of Docklands, and someone who has lived and breathed Docklands for the past 11 years is just having this whole beautiful structure that’s on the water gone.”
  • “Where else do you go? The reason you come to Docklands is for the water. There
    is nowhere to go on the water apart from a couple of restaurants.”
  • “The name Central Pier is for a reason – we’re the central focal point of Docklands. We bring Docklands together and now there is a gaping hole.”

DV has been unable to provide any comment on Central Pier while the matter is in court.