Professional Firefighter
Cancer Laws Have Been Trashed
Professional Firefighter Cancer Laws Have Been Trashed
latest campaign news
As our campaign enters its next phase, we are now targeting the seat of Richmond to highlight the Andrews Government’s trashing of firefighter cancer laws.
The Greens and Independents defended Firefighter Cancer Laws and opposed the Andrews’ Government’s amendments that removed the terminology of “Firefighter” and changed it to “Persons” from the very laws that were designed to protect your firefighters!
Firefighter Cancer Laws are based on scientific evidence.
The Cancer Laws that the Andrews Government trashed were based on this evidence.
Firefighters don’t have the option of waiting on the footpath while a building burns.
Firefighters don’t have the option to sample toxins prior to entering a burning building to determine the danger.
Firefighting is the only occupation where a worker is knowingly put into an unsafe workplace as part of their job.
Therefore, firefighters face an unavoidable risk when entering burning buildings to save life and property.
This is why the UFU has plastered the seat of Richmond with posters highlighting the treachery of the Andrews Government in deserting firefighters in their moment of need.

Campaign background
Professional career firefighters contract cancer at a higher rate than the general population because of the chemicals they’re exposed to in structure (house) fires.
This is an unavoidable risk professional firefighters face in protecting the community that they serve.
It is not an option for a professional firefighter to not enter a burning building to save life and property.
Because of this, professional firefighters have Firefighter Cancer Laws that protect them.
But these Laws have been trashed by the Andrews Government.
The Andrews Government – here led by Premier Andrews, Minister Symes, Minister Stitt and Ms Halfpenny – is the only Government in Australia that blatantly ignored the research presented to, and the final findings of, the Senate Inquiry that examined Firefighter cancer science. This is the Andrews Government’s shameful legacy.
On 8 March 2022, the Andrews Government rammed an omnibus Bill through Parliament, which irreversibly changed Firefighter Cancer Laws. The damaging effects of their changes include:
With the Andrews Government’s proposed changes, there will be detrimental effects to Firefighter Cancer Laws including:
- The integrity of the Presumptive Rights’ Scheme being compromised as there is no scientific, evidentiary basis for the inclusion of non-Firefighters in a scheme that provides a legal presumption with respect to cancers specific to structural firefighting (ie exposures to Firefighters from entering burning buildings).
- The viability of the scheme being compromised as it extends a legal presumption with respect to workers compensation to a cohort for which such exposures do not exist.Additionally, it exposes the scheme to the very issue it was designed to prevent– costly, lengthy litigation and challenges by the employer and the employer’s insurer.
Doing what Governments (in particular the Australian Senate) have sought to avoid – opening the “floodgates” to other civilians who may be employed by, or in relation to, the fire service, but do not enter burning buildings.
The extensive 2011 Senate Inquiry, which was the genesis point for presumptive legislation for Firefighters in Australia, considered the issue of coverage for non-Firefighter cohorts such as mechanics, and concluded and reassured the Parliament based on the scientific evidence, that the proposed Federal legislation:
“draws a line around firefighters and those engaged in firefighting activities. Coverage would not expend to other officers – such as mechanics or clerical officers – employed by the fire services.”
Exposure to professional firefighters: an unavoidable risk
But PPC must breathe to release the metabolic heat build-up as a result of the Firefighter working within this high-temperature heat & flame environment. If the PPC did not breathe, the Firefighter’s major organs would overheat and the Firefighter would perish. The design of Firefighter uniform is an unavoidable compromise.
As a Firefighter is working hard to put out the fire, upwards of 10,000 toxins and chemicals leech into their skin and, consequently, their blood stream. This is known as dermal absorption. This is an unavoidable risk. It is a Firefighter’s reality.
2011 Australian Senate Inquiry: Recognition of professional firefighter exposures
Following testimony around the country from Firefighters, Firefighter Widows and international Firefighter Cancer Law experts, the Senate Inquiry issued its Final Report, stating in part:
“The community holds a deep respect and gratitude for those who serve to protect and assist. If we are honest, however, along with this respect and gratitude comes a generous dose of expectation. We expect firefighters to come to our assistance when our homes, schools, hospitals and businesses are ablaze. We expect that a firefighter will enter a burning building when every human instinct tells us to leave. We expect they will search for those trapped inside and bring them out alive. We expect them to do what they can to minimise loss of life and damage to property. While everyone else is fleeing danger, it is the firefighter’s duty to tackle it head-on, to enter an extreme and dangerous environment, armed with the best protective gear available.
It is a duty firefighters take seriously, aware of the inherent risks to their own health and safety. This awareness on their part does not mitigate the community’s responsibility towards them.
The committee has carefully examined the large amount of evidence with which it has been presented. Study after study has pointed to a higher risk of cancer for firefighters than the general population. Science has confirmed what firefighters suspected for decades: that a disproportionate number of them in the prime of their lives are brought down with illnesses usually reserved for the old and the infirm.…
The committee recognises that when a person spends their professional career inhaling and absorbing known—and probably some as yet unknown—carcinogens in the course of public service, it is the moral duty of the community to enable them to seek compensation should they fall ill as a consequence. For this reason the committee believes this Bill needs to be passed after being improved upon through incorporation of the committee’s amendments.”
The Senate Inquiry recommended that the Cancer Law Bill be passed – and it was. The Bill was then replicated in each State around the country over the next 8 years.
Professional firefighter cancer studies: the underpinning science
- 2002 Tee Guidotti and David Goldsmith
“That it is reasonable given the available scientific evidence to adopt a policy of presumption for brain cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (lymphatic cancer) and leukemia (hematopoietic cancer) for claims association with occupation as a firefighter.” - Bates (2001 NZ) demonstrated an increased risk of testicular cancer in career NZ firefighters even when previously identified testicular cancer cluster cases were excluded.
- Baris (Philadelphia 2001) study of career Philadephia firefighters reported statistically significant excess risks for colon, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkins lymphomas.
- 2006 LeMasters et al A Meta-analysis of 32 studies of firefighters and cancer incidence and mortality that included approximately 110,000 full time career firefighters over the 32 studies from Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, Britain, France, Denmark which found increased cancer incidence for multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, prostate, testicular, stomach, colon, rectum, skin, malignant melanoma, brain and leukemia.
- NIOSH (2013) was a mortality and cancer incidence study of a cohort of approximately 30,000 career firefiighters in San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia which demonstrated an excess cancer mortality rate and incidence for mesothelioma, respiratory, digestive and urinary system cancers.“Our results provide evidence of a relation between firefighting and cancer.”
- NIOSH (2015) examined the relationship between the level of exposures and the incidence of cancer among the 2013 cohort of approximately 30,000 career firefiighters in San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia in the above 2013 study. “Significant positive associations between fire-hours and lung cancer mortality and incidence were evident. A similar relation between leukaemia mortality and fire-runs was also found.”
- Monash Study (2014) was the largest single study of career and volunteer firefighters and found:
- The overall the cancer incidence for career firefighters was significantly raised compared to the Australian general population, and in particular for male career full time firefighters, a statistically significant increase in prostate cancer, significant increased risk of melanoma, significantly higher risk of kidney cancer, amongst other findings.
- The incidence of cancer is significantly raised for male career firefighters who work for 20 years or more.
Why is presumptive legislation unique to firefighting?
Take a Firefighter in a burning structure who breaks their arm as a result of a roof collapse. The causation is the roof collapse, the effect is a broken arm.
But what if a 40-year-old Firefighter with 16 years’ service is diagnosed with primary site brain cancer?
Traditional workers compensation systems rely on the worker proving causation. In the case of a Firefighter with a cancer – which one of the thousands of fires caused the cancer? And which one of the tens of thousands of combustible materials, carcinogens, toxins or chemicals caused the cancer?
Conventional workers compensation systems enable a disease to be “deemed”, which can assist in proving the causation (exposure) and effect (disease) for workers compensation. However, the “deemed disease” list does not assist professional firefighters.
Even with the “deemed diseases” list, a professional firefighter cannot pinpoint which one of the thousands of fires or tens of thousands of carcinogens and toxins they have been exposed to.
Firefighter cancer science demonstrates that cumulative exposure to structure (building) fires over time creates a higher chance of a professional firefighter contracting certain types of cancer.
With presumptive legislation, there is a legal presumption that a Firefighter who has worked a specified period of time and who has been diagnosed with a specified cancer (one of 12 types) has contracted that cancer as a result of their cumulative, workplace exposures (entering burning structures) over time.

Letters sent to members of parliament

22 Feb 2022 – Firefighters’ Presumptive Rights: The Firefighters’ reality, the unavoidable risk, and the testimony of Firefighters at the 2011 Senate Inquiry

23 Feb 2022 – Proposed amendment to Firefighters’ Presumptive Rights contradicts OH&S requirements and Fire Services’ safe systems of work
Click here to send a letter to Victorian MPs
A firefighters Experience


